Main

Reviews Archives

March 13, 2007

300: Over Indulging Your Brain's Sweet Tooth

A man of considerable breadth stands on the edge of a cliff, the remnants of those sacrificed for genetic cleansing at its base, and inspects a newborn Spartan for adequate size and health. In this manner, all children of Sparta are granted passage into the kingdom shortly after their birth. In the same way, we are welcomed into Frank Miller's vision of Sparta and the world he has created for our entertainment.

I admit I've never so much as opened a Frank Miller graphic novel, but after watching Sin City two years ago and 300 yesterday, I think I have a pretty good idea about how his fair tastes. The focus of these films is not to commercialize the stories that Miller writes for the screen, but rather to faitfully adapt the visual spectacle to moving pictures. The result is an intense, explicit, sometimes disorienting pageant of ocular decadence.

And it is surely that. I had the good fortune of seeing 300 in an IMAX theatre. Watching this movie in that environment was like indulging in 45 pounds of chocolate pudding. My eyes and ears were treated to sensations unspeakable; only matched by the headache my over-stimulated brain punished me with afterward.

The inspection of King Leonidas at cliff's edge initiates his biography. The bio acts as a prologue for the story and paints every Spartan soldier as a formidable opponent engineered from birth. I say "paints" because, unlike the cartoonish nature of Sin City, every frame of this film has the feeling of a High Renaissance fresco. Upon vanquishing a Goliathean wolf thanks to a "heightened sense of things", Leonidas returns to Greece having completed his coming of age trials. It is in the same courtyard where the young Leonidas was trained that we are introduced to Leonidas the protagonist, played by the obviously Scottish Gerard Butler.

Butler's performance fits nicely into the movie. Every movement and line is big and delivered with poignancy. Perhaps this was the preferred method of inspiration and communication on the battlefield in Sparta, but in this context it eventually becomes trite.

And it is that tritness that initially gets the Spartans into a bind. Leonidas's cold reception of a Persian scout (read: he booted him into a bottomless pit) provokes Xerxes and his Persian empire into war. Unable to get a blessing from Sparta's elders, Leonidas is unable to make a suitable war against the Persians. So he bands together a small, expeditionary force and travels north to the narrow pass at Thermopylae. Here, the 300 make their stand against the Persians.

And a subtle stand it most certainly isn't.

Leonidas taunts Xerxes in their first meeting in the most entertaining dialogue of the movie. Xerxes responds in a deceptively low, god-like voice that clues you in as to why men would worship mortals. Again, there is not much subtlety here.

But no one should be seeing this movie for the subtlety. 300 is all about Director Zack Snyder and Art Director Isabelle Guay(The Fountain, The Jacket). Each and every picture of Frank Miller's novel (I gather) is portrayed in slow motion. For the logically disinclined, this means that nearly half the movie is done in slow motion. In any other film, this would never work. I would surmise that one could develop a tumor from this sort of overexposure to slow-mo. But, in staying faithful to the graphic novel format, Snyder uses the slower framerates to make sure every member of the audience sees exactly what Frank Miller would have them see, and in that end the slow motion works uncommonly well.

In the vein of Gladiator and the afformentioned Sin City, the entire movie is shot against a blue screen. Again, this would never work if the aim was to give a realistic account of the Battle of Thermompylae, but the CGI in this movie gives every scene the feeling that it was drawn and not shot in live action. Still, there are some landscapes that might have been better served with on-location shooting, but I hear it's difficult to get to ancient Sparta these days.

In the end, the movie is a mild success. It makes no political statements despite the backdrop of war and the squabbling over the nation's self defense. The modesty-challenged Queen Gorgo (played by the bountiful Lena Headely) makes a speech to the senate in the only real departure from paegentry throughout the film. If she had said anything of particular eloquence (despite the immediate words of the traitorous senator, Theron), then perhaps this scene would have had some power. As it stands, Jimmy Stewart will have to go on looking for a successor. One could argue that it is a pro-Iraq film just as easily as not. But there is nothing about 300 that should be overly analyzed. It is a work of pure visual beauty, and should not be lowered or raised to any other undeserved standard.

Tschüs!

July 6, 2007

Ratatouille: Tastes Like Inspiration

" I don't like food. I love it. if I don't love it, I don't swallow " - Peter O'Toole as Anton Ego in Ratatouille

There may not be a more concise way to describe the dichotomy of emotion wrapped up in a relationship with a medium. In this instance, the medium is food. Ego loves food, but his love of food is so powerful that if he is not absolutely in love with a dish, it becomes an insult to his favorite medium and worthy only of expectorate.

I do not claim to love any medium so much as Ego loves food, but I have certainly fallen deeply in like with the medium of film over the past several years. As a result, I have found myself upchucked from the innards of several theaters (home and commercial alike) still very much hungry for a more suitable meal.

Similarly, a select few movies have demanded that I return for seconds. I have delighted in microwaveable burritos (Pirates of the Caribbean, Star Wars), homemade steak and pierogies (Garden State, The Incredibles), and gourmet foie gras in a light truffle sauce (Pride and Prejudice, Finding Neverland).

Ratatouille is the latest nosh I have downed, and I've already had a second portion, but which category does it belong in?

Review: Ratatouille

Rats get a bad wrap. They're small, furry rodents that aren't but a few thousandths of a genome from the infinitely more popular gerbils, guinea pigs, and meerkats. Their simple desire to live near us is what vilifies them. That and those menacing tails.

So, consider it a challenge to characterize, develop, and center a movie around man's most annoying vermin - rats. And not just any rats, french rats. Brad Bird, always the maverick animator, was the cinematic chef bold enough to accept this tall order.

We are introduced to our six inch hero in full frame, airborne fashion, and the loveable Remy rarely relinquishes that domineering presence through the duration.

Remy (voiced competantly by Patton Oswalt) is a rat with especially heightened senses and a taste for the finer things. His brother Emelie and father Django (Peter Sohn and Brian Dennehy) do not possess his ideals or will to make a difference. Gluttony and survival seem to be their respective motivations.

Unfortunately Remy doesn't seem to be completely satisfied with the employment of his gifts - his heigtened sense of smell making him an ideal poison checker. His disaffection with mere survival moves him to forbidden ground; closer to a race that seems to hold his same passions. The embodiment of these passions - these ideals that Remy seems ingrained with - is Gusteau, the 5 star toast of Paris. Remy is enlivened by Gusteau's philosophy that "Anyone can cook" and emboldened to venture into human kitchens with Remy's own representation of Gusteau his constant companion.

Unfortunately, Remy's drive to create uproots his father's colony and separates him from his family. The rift, however, is quickly filled with love.

Ratatouille is, at its core, a love story. Along the lines of Disney Classics Aladdin, The Little Mermaid, and Cinderella, Remy must cross predefined societal boundaries to be united with his love. But, in a refreshing twist, the union that Remy makes by crossing the line is not the object of his love, but rather the vehicle for it.

Enter Linguini. The product of Gusteau's old flame, the fiery haired Linguini is introduced to us via flambé en cuisine Gusteau during the dinner rush. A neurotic clutz, Linguini (voiced delightfully by Lou Romano) seems to have taken on the coordination and demeanor of his namesake.

After turning a simmering pot into a culinary abomination, Linguini provides Remy with his very first chance to showcase his gift on a grand stage. The resulting soup catapults Remy (by way of Linguini) along with Gusteau's into victual relevance. It also sentences our rodent hero to death - a death his red haired executioner was never fit to carry out.

The resultant alliance between Remy and Linguini turns the hangman into a marionette. Remy becomes a sort of Cyrano de Bergerac (or CD Bales to the Steve Martin enthusiast). The passion and proficiency flow from Remy, but Linguini is the one making love (or food in this case, but it's all the same to the rat).

Ratatouille is the pinnacle of the truly inspired artist biographies. Like contemporaries Ray and Walk the Line, we are given a visual feast that meticulously conveys every facet of the creative process. The only downside to Ratatouille is that its hero is largely fictional.

Or is he?

Director/Screenwriter Brad Bird may or may not divulge how much of himself went into the charming rodent, but after witnessing every glorious frame, every magic permeated scene of Ratatouille saturated with the richest of ocular treats, I have to believe that Remy and Bird have distinctly similar beliefs about what creativity means to them and to the world.

So when the antagonist food critic, Anton Ego (voiced masterfully by the great Peter O'Toole [What genius did this casting, anyway?]), provides the only true carnal foil to Remy in the picture, it is no wonder that he is bested in the same fashion that Bird has defeated his own critics. I won't give away the climax, but prepare to be, as Ego writes, rocked to your core.

As I sit here and listen to the score via iTunes (gorgeously orchestrated by Michael Giacchino), I can't help but feel anxious about when I'll get a third helping of the most delectable cinematic indulgence of the year.

C'est la vie!

Grade:

A+

Foie gras and truffles it is then.

I'm going to end this entry with a solemn vow: If Ratatouille is not nominated for Best Picture by the Academy come next February, I will never put credence into the Oscars again.

This is the best movie I've seen in three years and rightfully makes the top 5 movies I've seen ever. After the shameless political rally of last March (Happy Feet? Really?), I'm putting the Academy on probation. I'll leave you with a list of awards we should be seeing Ratatouille take home next March:

  • Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role - Peter O'Toole
  • Best Animated Feature Film of the Year
  • Achievement in Art Direction
  • Achievement in Directing
  • Achievement in Film Editing
  • Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)
  • Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song) - "Le festin" - Camille
  • Original Screenplay
  • Best motion picture of the year

In my humble opinion, 5 Citizen Kane's would have to come out during the second half of this year to keep Ratatouille from being nominated in each of those categories.

Tschüs!

About Reviews

This page contains an archive of all entries posted to Cinematic Schizophrenic in the Reviews category. They are listed from oldest to newest.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33